Miss
A $477M B-21 charge drove the largest negative earnings surprise. Sales of about $9.5B fell 7% and missed consensus by roughly 5%. Backlog still rose to $92.8B.
[AS-051]A $477M B-21 charge drove the largest negative earnings surprise. Sales of about $9.5B fell 7% and missed consensus by roughly 5%. Backlog still rose to $92.8B.
[AS-051]2025 sales and free-cash-flow ranges were held, while Aeronautics and EPS guidance fell by the charge amount.
[AS-051]Holding sales and FCF required a strong second-half production ramp after a weak first quarter.
[AS-051]The 13% selloff reflected a direct challenge to confidence in fixed-price B-21 execution rather than end-market demand.
[MKT-001]A $477M B-21 charge drove the largest negative earnings surprise. Sales of about $9.5B fell 7% and missed consensus by roughly 5%. Backlog still rose to $92.8B.
A $477M B-21 charge drove the largest negative earnings surprise.
Sales of about $9.5B fell 7% and missed consensus by roughly 5%.
Backlog still rose to $92.8B.
2025 sales and free-cash-flow ranges were held, while Aeronautics and EPS guidance fell by the charge amount.
| Metric | Prior | Latest | Consensus | Delta | Status | Reason / implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 sales | $42.0–42.5B | $42.0–42.5B | Not consistently available | No change | Reiterated | Backlog and productionStrong H2 ramp required |
| 2025 EPS | $27.85–28.25 | Reduced for $477M charge | Not consistently available | Approximately charge amount | Lowered | B-21 EACOperational ex-charge view held |
| Aeronautics operating income | Prior range | Lowered | Not consistently available | Charge-driven | Lowered | B-21Margin reset |
| 2025 free cash flow | $2.85–3.25B | $2.85–3.25B | Not consistently available | No change | Reiterated | Cash timingBack-half weighted |
| Backlog | $91.5B | $92.8B | Not applicable | +$1.3B | Directional | AwardsDemand remains strong |
The environment supported long-term revenue and margin potential but created a large near-term charge and a more back-end-loaded sales requirement.
Holding sales and FCF required a strong second-half production ramp after a weak first quarter.
The 13% selloff reflected a direct challenge to confidence in fixed-price B-21 execution rather than end-market demand.
The roughly 13% first-day decline persisted, establishing a lower valuation base.
| Window | Stock | vs benchmark | vs peers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -12.7% | -15.2% | -13.4% |
| 2D | -11.0% | -15.3% | -10.3% |
| 5D | -9.0% | -16.2% | -10.8% |
Demand and backlog reached new highs, but a B-21 charge and delayed awards exposed the cost and timing risk in converting that demand.
"Strong demand signals from our global customers, resulting in another record backlog...of $92.8 billion"
Q1 total book-to-bill 1.2x; Mission Systems 1.42x; international 1.45x with $1bn+ MS awards and Poland's $745m AARGM-ER order
Managing a "first of its kind full year continuing resolution" with a top-line increase over FY24 and greater spending flexibility
"We've experienced delays in certain awards, which resulted in a slower sales ramp"; contracts "have not seen those...get awarded yet" but progressing
"Vast majority of our supply chain is sourced from domestic suppliers"; ~5% (<$1bn) sourced abroad, mostly Europe, with long-term purchasing agreements locking costs
Charge reflects a manufacturing process change to accelerate ramp plus "increases in the projected cost and quantity of general procurement materials," partly macro-driven
Management "embraces competition," comfortable with win rate even in non-FAR/OTA acquisition models, framing it as "about how good your offering is"
Mix shift toward fixed-price and international viewed as a margin tailwind; cost-plus to move from 54% toward 50-50 then 60-40 fixed-price
Consensus snapshots are reconstructed from contemporaneous broker notes; the flattened AlphaSense export does not preserve stable document URLs.
AlphaSense synthesis
Open source ↗Official company source
Open source ↗AlphaSense market-environment synthesis
Open source ↗